Prepare for the A Level Law Exam with engaging quizzes and practice questions. Our platform offers tailored resources that help you understand key legal concepts and improve your exam-taking skills.

Practice this question and more.


How is 'actual bodily harm' defined in legal terms?

  1. Any form of physical pain

  2. A serious injury requiring medical attention

  3. An injury that is not trivial

  4. Any injury that is visible

The correct answer is: An injury that is not trivial

The term 'actual bodily harm' (ABH) is defined legally as any injury that is not trivial. This definition reflects the legal understanding that ABH encompasses a range of injuries which, while not requiring serious medical intervention, still go beyond mere transient or trivial injuries. Courts interpret this definition to include any significant pain or injury that affects an individual, even if it is not serious enough to necessitate medical treatment. This understanding allows for a broad interpretation of what constitutes ABH, ensuring that various forms of physical harm, which may cause discomfort, distress, or a change in the individual's daily functioning, are included under this classification. Thus, a bruise or a cut that may not be life-threatening but is nonetheless more than trivial would qualify as ABH. In contrast, the other options do not accurately capture the essence of the legal definition. For instance, while serious injuries requiring medical attention may qualify for more severe charges or classifications, ABH specifically pertains to harm that is more than trivial without necessarily being serious. Similarly, merely visible injuries do not encompass all forms of harm that qualify as ABH, as some injuries might cause significant pain or distress yet remain internal or non-visible. Lastly, 'any form of physical pain' is too vague