Prepare for the A Level Law Exam with engaging quizzes and practice questions. Our platform offers tailored resources that help you understand key legal concepts and improve your exam-taking skills.

Practice this question and more.


In the case of Sullivan, what was determined to be a disease of the mind?

  1. Only physical illnesses

  2. Epilepsy

  3. All mental conditions

  4. Confusion and temporary states

The correct answer is: Epilepsy

In the context of the case of Sullivan, the court determined that epilepsy qualifies as a disease of the mind. This determination is significant because it highlights the legal framework in which certain medical and psychological conditions are categorized, particularly regarding the insanity defense in criminal law. The rationale is that epilepsy can affect a person's mental functioning during seizures, thus impacting their ability to control their actions or understand their consequences. This condition aligns with the legal criteria that consider a 'disease of the mind' as a mental impairment that can influence a person's cognitive processes. While it may seem that other options like all mental conditions or confusion and temporary states could be applicable, the law typically requires a more consistent understanding of how persistent mental impairment relates to culpability and responsibility. Physical illnesses do not encompass the legal definition of ‘disease of the mind’ as understood in this context. Thus, the primary focus on epilepsy underscores its recognized impact on mental stability and legal accountability.